Both the House-passed version of ACA repeal legislation, the American Health Care Act (AHCA), and the Senate’s version currently under deliberation – the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA) – include a particularly debilitating change: a per capita cap system of funding for Medicaid. This change would dramatically cut federal Medicaid funding to states. It would force states to make difficult decisions between benefit cuts, provider payment cuts and changes to eligibility requirements – or all of these in varying measure – in order to balance their budgets.
The LeadingAge Center for Applied Research prepared The Long-Term Care Workforce Crisis briefing paper for the National Commission for Quality Long-Term Care to address long-term care workforce problems affecting frail and disabled older adults in nursing homes, assisted living, other residential facilities and home and community-based settings.
A new training program in North Carolina will help personal and home care aides (PHCA) move more easily between care settings during their careers.
What’s the best way to recruit, train and retain personal and home care aides (PHCA)? Meet workers where they are, says Registered Nurse Leanne Winchester from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs.
Robyn Stone recommends 2 additional steps providers should take once they’ve established person-centered care as a priority.
A list of LeadingAge CFAR funders.
Providers of health care and affordable senior housing can change the lives of low-income older adults and help the nation meet its health reform goals. That may seem like a tall order. But Robyn Stone maintains that if these partners find creative ways to work together, they can take affordable senior housing to a whole new level.
This edition highlights research underway in conjunction with LeadingAge's Center on Applied Research, and models of achieving aging in place in non-subsidized settings as well.
Behavioral health and substance abuse issues can present a major challenge to organizations that house formerly homeless older adults.
Service coordinators in Georgia’s federally subsidized housing properties didn’t have to think very hard when LeadingAge Georgia asked them to name the biggest challenge they faced in serving older residents.
One responsibility landed consistently at the top of the list.
Service coordinators wanted help addressing the needs of residents who have mental health care needs.
“It was very clear that it was a real challenge for them,” LeadingAge Georgia President and Chief Executive Officer Walter Coffey recently told members of LeadingAge’s Housing Plus Services Learning Collaborative. The collaborative is supporting 12 community-based teams as they develop strategies to coordinate and deliver health and supportive services to residents of subsidized housing properties.
It took 2 years for Coffey to figure out how he could help service coordinators in Georgia help their residents. The answer came when Coffey attended a 2008 conference that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) co-sponsored in Atlanta.
That’s where Coffey learned about PEARLS—the Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives for Seniors.
PEARLS: Problem-Solving to Overcome Depression
PEARLS is designed to help older adults learn behavioral and problem-solving techniques that have been shown to reduce symptoms of depression and improve quality of life.
Individuals who have been trained as PEARLS counselors implement the program in community-based settings. These counselors work one-on-one with a program participant during 8 in-home sessions. A series of follow-up phone calls reinforces program themes and tracks resident wellbeing.
Problem-solving is at the heart of the program, says Dr. Mark Snowden, PEARLS project adviser.
“When you have overwhelming and unsolved problems, you have an increased rate of depression,” says Snowden. “If you can figure out ways to solve problems, the severity of symptoms of depression will, in fact, decrease.”
Participants also work with a PEARLS counselor to develop a plan to engage in activities that interest them and give them pleasure.
“I knew that this was the answer we had been looking for,” says Coffey about PEARLS. “The problem-solving treatment plan is such a brilliant model. It is almost a coaching model where the elder is coming up with the answers of what they can do and what they want to do. There is great potential for it to support our elders, especially in housing properties.”
A psychiatrist-led team trains PEARLS counselors and reviews each PEARLS case regularly. The supervising psychiatrist can also address other causes of depression and, when necessary, will work with the client’s primary care provider to begin more formal treatment for depression.
The Research behind PEARLS
The University of Washington School of Medicine initially tested PEARLS using a randomized controlled trial in community settings, according to Snowden, who is associate professor in the school’s Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
The study evaluated the impact of PEARLS on levels of depression, quality of life and health care utilization of 138 clients aged 60 years or older. Just over half (51.4%) of the study participants had minor depression and the remainder had chronic depression (48.6%).
Half of all participants were randomly assigned to participate in PEARLS, and half were randomly assigned to continue with their usual medical care.
Over 12 months, individuals who participated in PEARLS were more likely than those who did not receive PEARLS to:
- Have a 50% or greater reduction in depression symptoms.
- Achieve complete remission from depression.
- Have greater health-related quality-of-life improvements in both functional and emotional well-being.
- Have lower rates of hospitalization.
Service Coordinators and PEARLS
After Coffey discovered PEARLS at the CDC/SAMHSA conference, LeadingAge Georgia partnered with the Fuqua Center for Late-Life Depression at Emory University to train service coordinators in the PEARLS model.
Service coordinators were initially hesitant to join PEARLS, which they perceived as “very clinical,” says Coffey. But those who decided to participate in the training were glad they did, he says.
“They saw it as a way to really help their residents, to bring them out and engage them in the life of their community,” he says. “Later, (the service coordinators) told us, ‘This is the greatest addition to my job in years’ and ‘This is a skill that is really going to change (residents’) lives.’”
In addition, says Coffey, service coordinators found that their PEARLS training and experience helped them engage more successfully with local health care providers, including residents’ general practitioners.
“They were using the right language,” says Coffey. “They were able to say, ‘I assessed a person this way, and this is what we are learning.’ So they got more respect from health care providers. They got more feedback. They were also a lot better equipped to connect resident with the services they needed.”