Search this section by:
“Villages” offer a promising option to address the service needs of middle-class older adults looking for a way to age in their own homes and communities. But these member-owned organizations could have difficulty serving the needs of lower income populations and sustaining themselves financially over the long term. Those are the conclusions of a team of researchers who published the first scholarly study of the Village movement in the Aug. 2012 issue of The Gerontologist. Villages could improve their sustainability by affiliating with social service agencies, say the researchers. Those agencies could provide access to more secure financing sources and technical assistance. The authors also recommend that future research studies assess how Villages might adapt their current operating model in order to serve a more diverse population of older adults.
Villages are owned and led by the older adults who live in their own homes and want to age in place. They provide a variety of services to members who pay an annual fee. Those services might include:
Researchers surveyed 30 of the 42 Villages that were fully operational at the time of their study. In general, study findings fell into 4 categories: